The “Project Hopper” We Don’t Like to Admit Exists

One of the biggest misconceptions in Continuous Improvement (CI) is the idea that improvement simply “happens” because someone has a good idea, a solid data set, or a well‑written project charter.

But anyone who’s been around CI long enough knows the truth:

Improvement doesn’t fail from bad ideas — it fails from lack of leadership support and lack of prioritization.

In other words, without an active and intentional Project Hopper, even the best CI opportunities quietly disappear.

Leaders Shape the Flow of Improvement Work

CI teams can identify opportunities all day long. They can map processes, analyze data, run Kaizen or Rapid Improvement Workshops, and surface dozens of potential projects that would move the organization forward.

But if leaders aren’t:

  • reviewing those opportunities regularly
  • helping teams prioritize based on strategy and capacity
  • removing barriers
  • sponsoring the work
  • and creating time for people to actually implement

Improvement becomes optional — and optional improvement eventually becomes no improvement.

When leadership engagement drops, the organization inevitably slides back into firefighting.
And firefighting always feels productive… but never actually moves the business forward.

A Real Project Hopper Keeps You Out of Firefighting Mode

Every organization needs a visible, living Project Hopper — not a symbolic one, not a “check-the-box” one, and definitely not one that exists only in someone’s head.

A healthy Project Hopper helps teams:

  • Sort the noise from the real priorities
  • Avoid chasing low‑value distractions
  • Say “no” to the wrong work
  • Say “yes” to the right work at the right time
  • Protect capacity so improvements actually get finished

When the Project Hopper is active, curated, and reviewed often, teams stay focused.
When it’s ignored… everything becomes a fire, everything feels urgent, and improvement work gets pushed aside for tomorrow — again and again.

One More Thing… If Everything is a Priority, Nothing Is

This is where leaders make the biggest difference.
Supporting CI isn’t about assigning more work — it’s about creating the conditions where the right work can succeed.

Leaders who take the Project Hopper seriously:

  • Keep improvement aligned with strategy
  • Maintain a realistic pipeline
  • Prevent overload
  • Ensure completed projects deliver value
  • Reinforce that CI is not “extra work”—it’s the work

And when leaders don’t?
Well… ideas have a funny way of disappearing.

The Simple Takeaway

CI thrives when leaders protect, prioritize, and champion the work.
It struggles when they don’t.

If your time is spent mostly firefighting, it’s a sign your Project Hopper isn’t being used — or doesn’t really exist.

The good news? It only takes a bit of structure and leadership attention to turn that around.

And once you do, you’ll see the difference immediately: less chaos, more intention, and a culture where improvement actually sticks.

What’s your experience with Project Hoppers and the CI Project selection process?

2 thoughts on “The “Project Hopper” We Don’t Like to Admit Exists”

    1. Thank you Isabel for your comments.
      Once you start asking employees for improvement ideas, you need to have a way to effectively deal with them. Putting them in the shredder isn’t one of them. LOL But, when employees who submit ideas and don’t hear back from leadership, that’s where they feel their ideas ended up.

      I hope you check out my YouTube channel where you can find lots more on CI topics.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top